Kangpan & Co.

Contact

Author: Nathan Kangpan

  • I Left My C-Level Job at 38 to Build the Advisory Firm I Couldn’t Find

    When I left my C-level job in 2024, I didn’t have a business plan. I had a conviction.

    I was 38. Income from my investment portfolio had already replaced my salary. I’d spent years building something most financial advisors told me wasn’t realistic. A life funded by cashflows from investments, not a passive index fund I’d spend down at 65.

    All along the way I had been looking for an advisor who understood what I was building. Someone who could help me go further. Private markets, real estate, infrastructure. The way large endowments invest to fund their mission in perpetuity, but for individual investors.

    I couldn’t find one.

    Every advisor was oriented around a 60/40 portfolio and a retirement at 65.

    So I decided to build what I had been looking for. Something for people like me.

    I now work with people who want to replace a paycheck with income from their portfolio. Not someday, on an arbitrary retirement timeline, but intentionally and as soon as their portfolio makes it possible.

    What I love about what I’m doing now: I sit down with people and show them how to cut years off the timeline they had in their head through the same style of investing and financial planning that made it a reality for me.

    If you’ve had similar experiences with financial advisors trying to stick you into cookie-cutter formulas, I’d genuinely like to hear about it.

    Liked this post?

  • When Should I Exercise My Options?

    The optimal time to exercise your options and the right time to exercise your options are often different things. Here was the deciding factor for a director at a F500 company.

    Using Options to Realize Your Dreams

    The situation:

    • Mid 30s couple with two young children
    • Approaching mid-six figure income but majority of net worth locked in unexercised company options
    • Owns their current home

    The dream:
    Upgrade to a seven-figure forever home at some vague point in the future, but unsure when or if they could afford to do it.

    The strategy:
    Shifted timeline from vague future to 18 months by realigning financial focus on making this a reality:

    • Accounting for current home equity value
    • Creating targeted savings augmentation strategy using higher, after-tax yielding instruments than a typical HYSA
    • Exercising a portion of their options

    The “objective” answer to the optimal time to exercise options involves lots of academic calculations and hyper-specific, unknowable assumptions.

    The practical answer?

    Sometimes it’s as simple as looking at whether exercising your options allows you to live the life that you want to live now.

    I built a custom model for this client to determine how much we should exercise now vs. how much we should leave on the table to preserve future upside. We then exercised our target portion and locked in nearly six figures of their down payment – putting them solidly, and definitively on track to their dream home by this time next year.

    What Other Situations Does it Make Sense to Exercise Options Early?

    There many other situations where exercising your options earlier may make more sense than holding them including:

    • When you’re switching jobs and the options expire when your employment does
    • When you need immediate cashflow for a major life event
    • When you feel your net worth may be too concentrated in the position and you want to diversify your risk

    Financial tools should serve the life you’re designing, not the other way around. The academic optimal is often the enemy of the intentional.

    Originally Shared on LinkedIn. Follow me there to get regular content like this.

    Liked this post?

    Disclosures: Kangpan & Co. is a registered investment advisor. All content is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is an actual client case study. Results and recommendations are unique to each client situation.

  • Can I Afford Private School?

    I speak with a lot of high-earners who feel financially squeezed by private school. This is what we talk about together.

    When high earners have vague feelings of financial uncertainty, it’s not usually an issue of whether a specific item is affordable today.

    It’s more a question of long-term financial clarity. What implicit or explicit sacrifices are you making down the line because of how you want to support your family today?

    Paying for private school is one of the most common versions of this conversation. Three kids, $30K per year each.

    Although it technically fits in the yearly budget, there’s a creeping fear that paying tuition now is quietly stealing from retirement later.

    For the people in this situation, people who started saving aggressively in their late 20s and early 30s, that fear can be exaggerated.

    When you actually model it out, the nest egg they’ve already built is doing more work than they think.

    Here’s a quick hypothetical example.

    • A couple, both around 40 in a high-cost-of-living area
    • They earn $500k but feel squeezed between taxes, mortgage, and daily expenses
    • $2M already saved across retirement and investment accounts
    • They have three kids they want to put through K-12 private school that costs $30k per year per child

    Even if this couple stopped contributing to retirement for the next 25 years, that $2M they have now could grow to more than $12M by retirement at 65 assuming historical market returns on a moderately aggressive allocation between now and then.

    $12M in assets could equate to $480,000 in annual retirement spending using the simplified 4% rule.

    The wealth management industry has done an excellent job scaring high earners into maximizing retirement contributions at all costs. Some of that fear is legitimate. But for people who started early and saved aggressively, the marginal retirement contribution can end up being a nice-to-have, not a necessity.

    One of the most valuable things I do for clients is helping them see that they already have more financial flexibility than they’re giving themselves credit for.

    The clarity that comes from understanding short, medium, and long-term tradeoffs changes how people make decisions. It changes how they think about their careers. It changes whether they take the sabbatical, fund the private school, or finally make the move they’ve been deferring.

    The numbers are usually better than the fear.

    Originally Shared on LinkedIn. Follow me there to get regular content like this.

    Liked this post?

    Disclosures: Kangpan & Co. is a registered investment advisor. All content is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

  • Permission to Spend

    I’ve realized over the past year I don’t think about portfolios the way most people do. 

    I view portfolios as infrastructure that enables life to be lived intentionally. 

    I think a lot about what the point of investing is. And I spend a lot of time talking to people about what they want their portfolios to make possible for them. The most important framing has nothing to do with investing. It’s: 

    What is the life I want to live? 

    When I was in my 20s, I thought what I wanted was to end the game with the largest number possible.

    But over the years I’ve realized the point isn’t to die with the largest portfolio but to live a life that I can reflect back on and feel was truly enjoyable along the way. 

    A Personal Endowment is the best metaphor for what I’m trying to build. I want a portfolio that pays a steadily increasing income year over year that supports the life our family wants to live. 

    I am a product of two first-generation immigrants. Frugality and intentional spending were highly valued in our household. It is hard for me to “enjoy” spending money. I get much more of a thrill out of finding a good deal than in paying for an unnecessary luxury.

    This mindset helped me “retire” from a C-level career before 40. But it also meant years of depriving myself of vacations, concerts, and other experiences that I’ve come to regret.

    The forced cashflow that comes from the diversified income portfolio we live off has been a strong mechanism for enjoying life more with each year. It’s a number that is meant to be spent in order to ensure I don’t look back on missed experiences or the opportunities to treat the people I love.

    It’s become a system specifically designed to prevent my frugality and accumulation instinct from consuming the enjoyment that financial independence was supposed to enable. 

    What is it like living off income from a portfolio?

    Here’s what this looks like in our actual day to day life.

    I start each year by projecting out the cashflows our portfolios are expected to generate which forms our yearly budget. 

    As the year progresses, those cashflows have steadily increased (so far). 

    By September, I start paying out a portion of that excess cashflow to ourselves as a monthly bonus.

    During the holidays we’ll take some more of that excess cashflow and donate to causes we care about and then treat ourselves to a nice gift. Something we wouldn’t normally buy ourselves but we know we’d enjoy. This past year it was a new Switch for me and a nice pair of earrings for Sheila.

    When the new year starts, the budgets ratchet up as the cashflows increase. As the budgets increase, I try to make sure we’re intentionally setting aside funds to enjoy life together. 

    This year it was an extra $7,000 for vacations which we spent going to Sarasota in the winter months.

    My parents optimized for security. I spent years optimizing for financial independence. Now the forced cashflow from my income portfolio is optimizing for something neither of us quite had: the permission to actually enjoy what we built. 

    The financial independence I was building would solve life’s money problem. But the psychology that got me there would have prevented me from actually living it. 

    Nathan
    Founder & Lead Advisor
    Kangpan & Co.

    Kangpan & Co. is a fee-only, registered investment advisor specializing in helping people live off diversified portfolio income.

    This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment, tax, or legal advice. No post is an endorsement of any particular strategy or security. We do not receive any direct payments or commissions for securities discussed in our posts. Private funds are generally available only to ‘Accredited Investors’ as defined by the SEC. The Personal Endowment is a conceptual investment framework customized to each client and does not represent a specific fund or guaranteed outcome. Employees and clients of Kangpan & Co. may hold positions in securities discussed in posts. Speak with a licensed tax, legal, or financial advisor before making any changes to your investments or financial strategies. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk including the loss of capital.

  • Why is it important to benchmark your portfolio?

    Here’s how 1.0% turns into a $29,000 blind spot

    This is part of a series deconstructing a Portfolio Efficiency Audit we recently completed for a new client. For a $2.9M portfolio, these combined deficiencies can represent an annual opportunity cost in the low-to-mid five figures. We consistently see these issues across clients who have managed their own portfolios and those who have switched to us from other advisors.

    The Problem:
    Everyone has seen the headlines that active portfolio managers can’t beat a passive index. But most clients we work with have never seen their portfolio’s performance lined up against these passive benchmarks before coming to us. Especially those working with other advisors (three guesses why an advisor might like to obscure this data).

    The Math:
    Here’s some illustrative numbers to show how a $2.9M portfolio underperforming benchmarks isn’t just a rounding error:

    • at 0.5% it’s $14,500 a year in lost opportunity
    • at 1.0% it’s $29,000 a year
    • at 1.5% it’s $43,500 a year

    At 1.0% a year you’re looking at $290,000 over the next ten years – before taking into account any growth.

    The Strategy:
    The first step of our audit is a cold, hard look at reality. We benchmark our clients’ legacy portfolios against objective global benchmarks to identify where there may be major performance gaps.

    S&P recently found 88.3% of active managers underperformed the S&P 500 over the last 15 years. In large-cap stocks, the “market return” is often the smartest move.

    Conversely, that same study found 40.7% of US Muni Managers beat their index in that timeframe. This is where careful selection of active managers may pay off.

    We look at the portfolio as a whole and individual asset classes.

    An effective portfolio manager knows where to accept the indexed market return and where active management actually adds value.

    Originally Shared on LinkedIn. Follow me there to get regular content like this.

    If you liked this post:

    Disclosures: Kangpan & Co. is a registered investment advisor. All content is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Based on actual $2.9m portfolio audit completed for a recent client; all math in this post is illustrative to protect client privacy. Research referenced via S&P’s SPIVA (June 30, 2025).

  • Paying for K-12 Tuition with a 529

    In many states you can use 529 funds for K-12 private school tuition. And by routing payments through a 529 first you can capture a state tax deduction on spending you were going to do anyway.

    I’ve noticed so many parents paying private school tuition are leaving free money on the table every year. And it’s all because of a simple sequencing mistake.

    Here’s what I mean.

    Let’s say you live in Pennsylvania and have two kids in K-12 private school. Tuition is $30,000 per year per kid.

    You’re probably writing a check directly from your bank account. Straightforward. Simple. And quietly costing you $1,228 per year in state tax savings you didn’t have to give up.

    Here’s a better approach.

    The federal limit for using 529 funds for K-12 expenses was bumped up to $20,000 per student per year as of 2026.

    So instead of paying tuition directly, first deposit the funds into each child’s 529 Plan. Then pay the tuition from the 529. That’s it.

    PA allows you to deduct 529 contributions from your state taxes, and because there’s no minimum holding period before using the funds for qualified K-12 expenses, you’ve effectively turned a routine tuition payment into a state tax deduction.

    Here’s the simple math.

    • $20,000 per child (the federal limit) × 3.07% PA state tax rate = $614 back per child
    • Two kids = $1,228 per year. Every year. For spending you were going to do anyway.

    Not life-changing money. But $1,228 in annual savings that compounds over a decade of private school tuition is worth knowing about — especially when capturing it only takes a few steps.

    Note, every state has different rules. Some don’t allow K-12 deductions at all. Some have contribution limits that affect the math. Check your state’s specific rules or ask an advisor. If you’re a high earner in a high-tax state, your numbers could look even better than the Pennsylvania example above. The higher your marginal state rate the more this matters.

    This is one of those optimizations that looks small in isolation but is exactly the kind of thing that adds up when you’re navigating the squeeze years — private school, mortgage, family life, and trying not to compromise what you’re building for the future.

    If you’re navigating the squeeze years I’d be curious what financial questions are keeping you up at night.

    Originally shared on Linkedin. Get more content like this:

    • Subscribe to my Substack for longer pieces on income investing and building a life funded by portfolio income, subscribe to my newsletter. No paywalls.

    Disclosures: For educational purposes only. Not investment advice.

  • Hidden Fees in Wealth Management

    Summary:

    You think you’re only paying 1.0%. That’s the AUM rate they quoted you. But this could significantly understate how much your big institution advisor or “Private Client Banker” is actually pocketing from your family. Here are the five most common ways big institutions turn your hard-earned money into their bottom-line profits and how to find them in your statement.

    How much are additional fees costing you?

    Why should you care about hidden fees? After all, it’s just parts of a percent right?

    Here is an illustrative, hypothetical example of how much hidden fees on a $2.0M portfolio could be siphoning away:

    • $5,000/yr at 0.25% in hidden costs
    • $10,000/yr at 0.50%
    • $15,000/yr at 0.75%

    And keep in mind, this is on top of the 1.0% that is their base advisory fee. On $2.0M that’s $20,000 a year as the starting point before these additional fees. In the game of wealth management, small percentages add up quickly to big numbers.

    Let’s get into what all these fees are and how you can find them.

    Fee 1: 12b-1 Fees or Sales Kickbacks

    A 12b-1 fee is a “marketing and distribution” charge attached to certain mutual funds. This typically runs 0.25% to 1.0% of your investment every year. The industry originally created these fees to cover the cost of promoting a fund to new investors. But if you ask us, it’s a bit strange to be charged a marketing fee every year for something you’ve already bought. In practice, this fee tends to be used as a kickback to the advisor or brokerage that sold you the fund. Not only does it cost you, but it creates perverse incentives for advisors to recommend the funds that pay them the most, not necessarily the ones that generate the returns most aligned to your goals.

    To find it, pull up your fund’s prospectus or fact sheet and look for a line item labeled “12b-1 fee” in the fee table. It’s usually disclosed separately from the fund’s overall expense ratio, not folded into it.

    Fee 2: Internal Platform or “Technology” Fees

    This is a fee charged by the custodian holding your investments or the platforms used to service your account. This is separate from the service fee your advisor charges and separate from what your funds charge. The big advisors have lots of their own in-house platforms and these fees are simply for the privilege of using their “infrastructure.”

    To find it, check your account statement for any line item that isn’t a fund expense or an advisory fee. That means anything labeled “platform,” “custodial,” or “admin” fee is worth a second look. If nothing on the statement is obvious, ask your advisor directly for an itemized breakdown of every fee assessed against the account over the past year. If they can’t produce one quickly, that’s a signal worth paying attention to on its own.

    Fee 3: Trading or Brokerage Fees

    These are charges assessed every time a trade happens in your account like buying or selling a stock, fund, or ETF. Most major brokerages have eliminated commissions on standard stock and ETF trades, but the firms with big trading desks can still make a spread on the difference between buying and selling less liquid products like bonds or derivatives across clients. An advisor who trades frequently, whether or not it’s in your best interest, can quickly rack up fees behind the scenes.

    To find these, review your account’s trade confirmations or the transaction history section of your statement. Each trade should show any commission or fee charged alongside it. If you’re not sure what “frequent” trading looks like for your account type, ask your advisor directly how many trades were made in the past year and why. A reasonable answer should be easy to explain in a sentence or two without requiring a spreadsheet.

    Fee 4: Expensive Funds and other Products

    Not every fee shows up as an auditable line item. Sometimes the fee is baked into the product itself, like a high expense ratio for an ETF or mutual fund. Two funds tracking the same index can differ by ten times or more in what they cost you annually, with almost zero difference in what you actually own. Actively managed funds, in particular, often charge significantly more than a comparable passive alternative, without reliable evidence they outperform it after fees.

    The big name firms often have their own “proprietary” versions of common strategies that have much higher fees than other providers. This is where the firm itself is making more off of your assets without needing the advisory part of the business explicitly charging you for it.

    To find these kinds of fees, look up the fund’s expense ratio (a single percentage, usually listed right alongside the fund name on your statement) and compare it against a low-cost index fund tracking the same or a similar benchmark. If you’re paying more than the low-cost index version provided elsewhere, it’s worth understanding exactly what you’re getting for the difference.

    Fee 5: Cash Sweeps

    When cash sits uninvested in your accounts, it doesn’t just sit there. It gets automatically “swept” into a money market or bank sweep account the firm or brokerage chooses for you. They then earn interest on that cash at the prevailing market rate, but often pay you a fraction of it. For example, if money market funds are paying 4-5%, the firm you’re working with may be making that on your cash but pay you just 1-2%. That difference is pure profit for the brokerage, earned on money that’s technically yours.

    Check your statement for the exact name of your “sweep” or “cash management” account and look up its current yield. Then compare it against a competitive money market fund at the same brokerage (most offer a better-paying alternative, they just don’t default you into it). If the gap is more than a percentage point or two, you’re leaving significant money on the table simply by not asking to be moved into the better option.

    Want help figuring out how much you’re actually paying?

    It is important to perform these types of audits with any advisor you work with. Transparency should be a requirement, not a preference. We believe investors should know exactly how much they are paying their advisor so they can make an informed decision on whether the value matches the costs.

    If you’d like help figuring out how much you’re paying your financial advisor, feel free to reach out to me using my email below for a complimentary, Hidden Fees Audit.

    Kangpan & Co. is a flat-fee, independent advisor. We do not charge commissions or hide any fees. What you see is what you get and we think the rest of the industry should do the same.

    Nathan
    Founder & Lead Advisor
    [email protected]

    The Tradeoff

    Get more insights, strategies, and stories just like this delivered straight to your inbox every other week. Always free, no paywalls.

    Check it Out

    Kangpan & Co. is a flat-fee financial advisory firm specializing in helping mid-career professionals navigate the career, family, and financial tradeoffs that come with this stage of life. This content is for educational purposes only and is not financial, legal, or tax advice. Consult a licensed advisor for help with your individual situation. Employees and clients of Kangpan & Co. may hold positions discussed in our content. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

  • What Worked: 9 Things That Made Me Financially Independent Before 40

    I didn’t feel relief the morning I realized I had enough money to leave my corporate job. I felt terrified. My spreadsheet said I was ready. Every number I had been tracking confirmed it. I didn’t know what to do. 

    I started the spreadsheet in 2016. Net worth in one column. Expenses in another. Portfolio income in the third. I was in my late 20s and had decided my goal was to become financially independent before 40 by having my portfolio generate enough income to eliminate my need for a salary. 

    I achieved that goal at 38 when I resigned from my C-level corporate career to start a more intentional second act.

    Here’s what helped me get there. 

    Ignoring traditional retirement calculators

    Most retirement calculators I’ve come across focus on how long it will take for your portfolio to match your current income in retirement. I disagree with this framing. The goal isn’t to match the income you’re making, it’s to cover your costs. 

    Relying on retirement calculators that focus on meeting your salary artificially extends the amount of time you need to work before you’re able to retire. This is especially true for high achievers where income rapidly outpaces your underlying living expenses. Trying to match that income becomes a moving target.

    Financial independence became a simple calculation for me.

    When the income I could generate from my portfolio reliably exceeded my underlying expenses, I knew I was ready to go.  

    Closely tracking expenses against portfolio income every month

    I’ve sat down every month for the past decade to calculate our net worth, the income we generate from our assets, and our expenses. For expenses, I manually go line by line in my spreadsheet through our credit card and checking statements, categorizing everything against the budgets laid out at the beginning of the year. 

    I am well aware I can use technology to do this but the act of going line by line makes our spending much more tangible. I also think more clearly about whether certain expenses were worth it. Like that ongoing subscription to YouTube Premium (the answer has been yes for 70+ months). 

    Regularly examining our costs prevented unnecessary lifestyle inflation that would have delayed the timeline to leaving my corporate career. 

    Plus the act of watching portfolio income gradually meet and then exceed expenses was highly motivating. It was like steadily leveling up in a video game month after month.

    Viewing costs in terms of portfolio income

    As I wrote about recently, the more I went through my monthly planning process, the more I started thinking about everything in terms of portfolio income rather than salary.

    The first question I asked about any major purchase wasn’t whether we could afford it based on my corporate salary. It was whether we could afford it based on income generated by our portfolio. The difference between those two calculations is significant when you’re trying to leave the corporate world.

    In 2020 our realtor tried to convince us to look at homes $300,000 above the price we’d decided on. His logic was that mortgage rates were so low the extra $1,000 a month was barely noticeable on a C-level salary. He was right about the salary math.

    But I wasn’t thinking about the salary. Here’s how that extra $1,000 a month actually looked to me.

    $12,000 a year in additional mortgage payments. Another $300,000 I’d need to build in my portfolio to cover it at a 4% income yield. Potentially another year of working to get there.

    We bought the house we originally planned to buy.

    It’s a home Ryan Serhant isn’t about to come knocking on to film a video tour. I’d call it reasonable luxury rather than egregious ostentation. We love it.

    The same logic applied to the school district we chose. Picking a strong public school meant we wouldn’t need to pay for private school. The difference between $8,000 a year in school taxes and $60,000 a year in private school tuition for two kids represents roughly $1.25 million in additional portfolio value I would have needed to build. That meant potentially three to four more years of corporate work.

    You don’t have to be Spartan about everything. The small stuff barely moves the needle. But the large fixed costs like housing, cars, and schools are the decisions that significantly impact your timeline to financial independence. Getting those right is worth more than a decade of optimizing everything else.

    Finding a good accountant early on

    My taxes were straight forward for the first decade or so of my career. Up through my late 20s, I was renting in NY, had a single W2 income, a 401k, and a modest taxable brokerage account. Standard tax software was good enough for handling this.

    It was 2018 when things got more complicated. This was the year we sold our company and I had a liquidity event I had to manage. My investments started producing meaningful income and I was suddenly in higher tax brackets where finding ways offset income became significantly more valuable. 

    I started working with an accountant who more than justified their ongoing yearly fee based on just the estimated tax penalties they helped me avoid in 2018. 

    Working with an accountant also changed my mindset regarding taxes from something I passively calculate at the end of each year to something that I can actively manage. Which led me to…

    Studying tax optimization

    I believe in paying the taxes I owe. But I don’t think it’s necessary to leave the IRS a tip. 

    The accountants have been good at helping me understand how to avoid mistakes in the future based on mistakes I made in the past. They are not as helpful with proactive tax mitigation within the year or minimizing taxes years from now.

    So I started learning more about how I could actively manage my taxes throughout the year. I know most people like to avoid thinking about taxes as much as possible but the 10-15 hours a year I spent reading about and modeling different tax strategies has likely saved tens of thousands in taxes over the years (and possibly hundreds of thousands compounded). 

    The optimizations I made to my approach ranged from taking advantage of credits for things we were going to do anyway like replacing the rusting water heaters that came with our home to implementing portfolio strategies like tax location and gain / loss harvesting.

    The ROI from understanding and proactively managing tax strategies has been significant and immediate. The savings funneled directly back into reducing the timeline to reach financial independence.

    Transitioning to an income-centric investing strategy 

    One of my biggest fears about leaving my corporate job was timing.

    What if the market collapsed in the first couple years after I left? The traditional retirement playbook of accumulating a large portfolio and then withdrawing 4% annually sounds reasonable until you think through what can actually happen in that scenario.

    You need to sell assets to fund your life. Those assets have just dropped 30%-40%  in value. You’re selling significantly more shares than you planned to cover the same expenses. And this can go on for years. The markets recover eventually but you’ve permanently impaired your portfolio in the process.

    This is known as sequence of returns risk and it’s one of the main reasons people who retire into a bear market never fully recover financially even if the market eventually does.

    I wanted to solve for this.

    So I built a portfolio designed to generate income from multiple sources rather than rely on selling shares to cover my expenses. The S&P 500 index was the right tool for growing wealth while I was accumulating. But I needed a different set of tools for a different job. Blue chip companies with long track records of paying steadily increasing dividends. Apartments around the country generating rental income. Power plants with contracted cash flows tied to inflation.

    The insight that changed everything for me was simple. 

    I could live off income. I can’t live off a price.

    Price is what the market says my assets are worth today. Income is what my assets actually pay me.

    The markets can drop 40% but, as 2008 and 2022 demonstrated, the rent from a well-located property with high quality tenants still gets collected. The power plant still gets paid to put electricity into the grid. The dividends from a company with 25 consecutive years of steady dividend growth still arrive.  

    The income keeps coming regardless of what the price of the underlying asset is doing on any given Tuesday.

    This isn’t the same as being immune to economic stress. A severe enough recession can affect anything. But the income-centric portfolio is designed to keep funding my life through the conditions that would devastate a withdrawal-based approach.

    The result has been exactly what I was hoping for. The payments from my income assets have come in steadily and grown each year regardless of what has been happening in the markets. We pay our bills, go out to nice family dinners, and there’s something left over to reinvest. The anxiety of watching a portfolio value fluctuate while wondering if it will last has been replaced by watching an income line that keeps growing.

    The market can do whatever it wants. The income arrives anyway.

    Focusing on a career I enjoyed

    I want to be careful about how I frame this one because it can easily sound like the kind of thing people say when they’ve been lucky.

    But here’s what I actually observed over nearly two decades in the corporate world.

    I genuinely liked what I did. Analyzing the problems facing large companies and then solving them through data, creativity, and technology. There was a lot of intellectual variety. Every client was in a different industry, every problem had a different shape. I also liked the people I worked with. I liked getting better at my job.

    That enjoyment had a specific and compounding effect on my timeline to financial independence that went beyond just earning a higher salary.

    When you enjoy your work you do more of it voluntarily. You read about it, think about it, get curious about adjacent problems. You develop genuine expertise rather than adequate competence.

    That expertise compounds into career opportunities that going through the motions doesn’t produce. This difference may be small at first but grows dramatically over a decade in terms of compensation and fond memories.

    I think if I had been doing work I didn’t enjoy the entire time I would have burned out or plateaued in middle management. Either outcome would have added years to my timelines.

    Work you enjoy is one of the most underrated variables in how quickly you can reach financial independence. Not because of the salary but because of what sustained engagement does to your trajectory over time.

    Choosing career paths with asymmetric upside

    I mentioned a liquidity event earlier. Here’s more detail on how I got there and how it impacted my journey to financial independence.

    It was 2012. I had spent the past four years in consulting and I was ready for something different. I was being recruited for a couple different Director level jobs.

    One was a role with a Fortune 500 company. Great name, slightly higher compensation, perfect resume builder, but no significant upside potential. The work would be routine and bureaucratic. This was the safe option on paper and the one that would pay $10-20k a year more in salary. 

    The other was where I went. An advertising agency that just started going two months earlier that no one had heard of where I would have less pay and less “prestige”. But, I would have a very interesting role. I would be part of the management team and have a more direct impact on the direction of the firm. And I’d get a modest amount of equity that could be worth something one day.

    I remember thinking the worst case was if the agency didn’t work then I would have spent a few years doing something I enjoyed doing anyway. My bank account might have $40-50k less in savings than if I had chosen the big name company. But the best case was we would knock it out of the park and the equity would be worth something one day. The downside was capped, the upside was significant. 

    We sold the company six years after I joined.

    Now, luck undoubtedly played a role in all this. Most small businesses fail. When I made my decision to join the advertising company, there was no way to tell how successful we would be.

    But the important thing was that the potential was there, along with the equity that would mean more direct participation in that success. There was no potential for that kind of asymmetric payoff in the Fortune 500 company.

    This liquidity event impacted my financial independence journey in two unexpected ways. 

    The first is that it pulled up my original timeline to financial independence by about five years. The spreadsheet and targets I had been tracking against didn’t assume a liquidity event. I don’t like to include positive outlier events in my baseline forecasting. If they happen, great. If not, my original strategies that are more firmly in my control are still on track.

    Second, I was still enjoying my role with the company when this happened and felt I hadn’t accomplished the things I wanted to yet within my first career. So instead of leaving my job years ahead of schedule, the impact of the acquisition was more an unexpected improvement to the quality of life I had been modeling. The portfolio we were building would now be able to support a slightly nicer home and a couple more family vacations each year.

    The point isn’t to bet on startups. It’s to make sure that when you’re choosing between two paths, at least one of them has genuine upside worth reaching for. 

    Building a shared life 

    This last piece is the most important one.

    When I first started working towards financial independence it was just me. I hadn’t met Sheila yet. I didn’t have kids. My spreadsheet hadn’t accounted for how life would (positively) evolve over the years.

    As we started planning for kids, Sheila wanted to prioritize raising our children over continuing her career in advertising. That meant I would need to work a couple more years than I was planning to so the portfolio could cover her lost income.

    We both knew what we were trading. I would spend a bit more time in a corporate job in exchange for something we both wanted more, the ability to show up for each other and our kids during all of life’s key moments.

    We agreed early on to work towards financial independence first and improve our lifestyle after. So we kept our spending in check through those final years. We’re not miserly — we like nice things. But the Porsche in my garage right now looks a lot more like a 2015 Jeep Wrangler. We AirBnB our beach vacations rather than owning a beach house.

    The steadily growing income from the way our portfolios are designed will cover these things in the years to come. In exchange, the joy and closeness we’ve had as a family fortunate enough to spend so much intentional time together were more than worth it.

    So, was it worth it?

    As I reflect on the years spent working towards and then achieving financial independence, I’ve come to realize something that surprised me.

    Financial independence is not a destination. It’s a transition point.

    I had spent years focused on what I didn’t want anymore. The compromises that come with a corporate career. The clients you work with because you have to rather than because you want to. The slow accumulation of days that no longer feel like yours.

    What I hadn’t fully anticipated was what the transition would open up.

    The best way I can put it is that financial independence allows me to think about the world the way I did when I was a senior in high school. Suddenly the possibilities seem endless again.

    In a follow-up post I’ll share the things that kept me from getting here faster and what I wish someone had told me earlier about working towards financial independence.

    If any of this resonated with your own situation, I’d genuinely love to hear about it.

    Nathan
    Founder, Kangpan & Co.

    Kangpan & Co. is a fee-only, registered investment advisor specializing in helping people live off diversified portfolio income.

    This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment, tax, or legal advice. No post is an endorsement of any particular strategy or security. We do not receive any direct payments or commissions for securities discussed in our posts. Private funds are generally available only to ‘Accredited Investors’ as defined by the SEC. The Personal Endowment is a conceptual investment framework customized to each client and does not represent a specific fund or guaranteed outcome. Employees and clients of Kangpan & Co. may hold positions in securities discussed in posts. Speak with a licensed tax, legal, or financial advisor before making any changes to your investments or financial strategies. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk including the loss of capital.

  • Private Real Estate Funds: Tax Benefits, Income, and What to Watch Out For

    If you’re trying to live off portfolio income, you need to bring together stable, after-tax income from diversified sources. And very few asset classes look better on paper for this purpose than mature, cash-flowing real estate properties.

    I’ve always wanted to own a broadly diversified real estate portfolio for the predictable, monthly income. But, as Sheila can attest to, my handyman skills don’t extend much beyond putting together Ikea furniture and hanging the paintings we find antiquing. 

    Enter Private Real Estate Funds.

    In this primer we’ll cover:

    • What is a Private Real Estate Fund?
    • The three key benefits they can bring to a portfolio
    • The downsides of this asset class

    What is a Private Real Estate fund?

    As the name implies, Private Real Estate funds are investment vehicles that primarily invest in… real estate. This could be any type of real estate from multi-family housing to data centers. 

    Since the underlying assets are physical properties charging rent, returns from these funds typically include a meaningful dividend yield as well as underlying appreciation of the assets over time. 

    These funds are typically managed by an outside investor who charges a fee for sourcing and managing the underlying investments. Private funds are not traded on stock exchanges but can be purchased through certain financial advisors. The partnerships we’ve developed ensure clients of Kangpan & Co. have access to many of the same institutional funds that the private investment arms of large banks do. 

    Before we dig into the characteristics that make Private Real Estate funds a core component of the Personal Endowment investment portfolio, I need to note that these funds are generally for accredited investors as defined by the SEC. This post is for educational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or endorsement of anything specific strategy or fund. Kangpan & Co. is a fee-only RIA, we do not accept commissions or any other form of compensation from fund providers. We like our recommendations to clients to be free from conflicts of interest.

    Now let’s get to three ways these funds can benefit a portfolio.

    Benefit 1: Diversification vs. Other Core Assets

    If you’re trying to build a portfolio that generates income across different types of economic environments, you need genuine diversification. Investments need to have returns with low long-term correlations to each other so that when a shock hits, your entire portfolio doesn’t move in the same direction at once.

    This is the canonical argument for holding both stocks and bonds. But as 2022 demonstrated clearly, a two-asset portfolio has real limits. When inflation drove interest rates sharply higher, both stocks and bonds fell simultaneously, leaving portfolios that assumed low correlation between the two with nowhere to hide. 

    Private real estate has historically shown low correlation to both public equities and fixed income. According to an analysis from CAIS, private real estate returns have had a correlation of approximately 0.11 to the S&P 500 and -0.28 to the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index over a recent 15-year period.

    The economic drivers of real estate returns – rental income, occupancy rates, property values – respond to different forces than corporate earnings or interest rate movements, even if they’re not entirely immune to macro conditions. 

    This doesn’t mean private real estate is uncorrelated to everything all the time. A severe recession can affect private real estate too. But adding it to a portfolio of dividend equities and fixed income creates a third set of return drivers (which is the point). 

    Our Personal Endowment portfolios incorporate real estate positions by default as well as additional asset classes to further diversify income sources.

    Benefit 2: Tax-Deferred Income

    Much like an individual investing directly in an apartment building, certain non-cash expenses like depreciation are deducted from the income generated by properties owned by private real estate funds. 

    These deductions get wrapped into what’s known as Return of Capital, or ROC. ROC distributions aren’t taxed as current income. Instead they reduce the cost basis of your investment over time, deferring the tax liability until you eventually sell. Potentially at lower long-term capital gains rates rather than ordinary income rates.

    For someone living off portfolio income, or for anyone in a meaningful tax bracket, this distinction is significant. 

    Here’s how this works in practice.

    Let’s say you’re in the 35% federal tax bracket and pay state taxes of 5.0%. We’ll ignore NIIT and local taxes for now to keep things simple.

    Scenario 1: You have $300k in a taxable corporate bond fund that yields 4.5%. 

    • $300k * 4.5% yield = $13,500 in pre-tax income
    • $13,500 * 40% combined tax rate = ~$5,400 in taxes
    • Leaving you with $8,100 after-tax income

    Scenario 2: Let’s look at the same math with a Private Real Estate fund that also yields 4.5% but 80% of it categorized as ROC.

    • $300k * 4.5% yield = $13,500 in pre-tax income
    • $13,500 * (1-80% ROC) = $2,700 in taxable income
    • $2,700 taxable income *  40% tax rate = $1,080 in taxes
    • Leaving you with $12,420 after-tax income

    Same yield. Same tax bracket. $4,320 more in your pocket annually simply from how the income is classified. On $300,000 that’s a 53% improvement in after-tax income from a single asset class. 

    Keep in mind, this example was only looking at the yield of a private real estate fund and not underlying appreciation of the fund’s properties which can add even more to the total return over time.

    ROC can range significantly between funds and shouldn’t be the primary lever you look for when evaluating options. That said, we always look at ROC for funds within our Personal Endowment portfolios since we use these strategies to optimize after-tax income for our clients.

    If you’re wondering how much of your current portfolio income is being unnecessarily eroded by taxes, this is one of the first things we look at in our Personal Endowment review. Contact us or schedule a complimentary consultation if you want us to audit your current situation.

    Benefit 3: Reduced Volatility via Appraisal-Based Pricing

    Public stocks and bonds are priced continuously by the market. Every piece of news, every Fed statement, every earnings miss moves the price in real time – often dramatically and in ways disconnected from the underlying business fundamentals.

    Private real estate funds are generally valued quarterly through formal appraisals by standardized internal pricing models and independent valuators. The inputs are things like rental income, occupancy rates, cap rates, and comparable property transactions – not sentiment, momentum, or a Twitter thread about interest rates.

    What this means practically is that the reported value of your private real estate allocation moves more slowly and in response to genuine changes in the underlying properties. This has the effect of dampening the day to day swings in your portfolio.

    It’s important to clarify, appraisal-based pricing doesn’t mean you’re getting a better deal than the market would offer. It just means the price reflects a fundamental assessment of the asset rather than a real-time market clearing price.  The valuation of a private real estate fund could be lower or higher than publicly traded REIT equivalents depending on current market sentiment.

    What are the risks of Private Real Estate Funds?

    No asset class is without tradeoffs, and private real estate funds have specific ones worth understanding clearly before investing.

    Gated redemptions: Unlike a stock or ETF you can sell tomorrow, private real estate funds typically have strict limits on when and how much you can redeem. Most funds allow redemption on a quarterly basis with meaningful advance notice requirements, and during periods of market stress funds can gate redemptions entirely. Meaning you cannot access all your original capital regardless of how much you need it in the moment. This is the illiquidity premium at work. You earn higher after-tax income in part because you’re accepting that the capital is not freely accessible. For anyone investing in these funds the capital should be genuinely long-term, money you don’t need to touch for five to seven years minimum.

    Manager Quality and Fees: In a public index fund the manager is largely irrelevant — you’re buying the market. In private real estate, the manager’s skill at sourcing deals, managing properties, and timing the cycle determines a significant portion of your return. And the managers get paid to do this work. Private fund fees can be meaningful, typically 1% to 1.5% in management fees plus performance incentives. Private funds need to be evaluated against the net return of fees they deliver rather than the topline gross return marketing materials may highlight. We evaluate our funds carefully before recommending them and access institutional share classes where available to minimize fee drag.

    Valuation Opacity: Quarterly appraisals reduce volatility but also mean you have limited visibility into what your investment would actually fetch in a sale at any given moment. The reported value of a private real estate fund should be treated as an estimate rather than a market price. Some funds report when they sell their underlying assets and comparing the market price they receive for their assets vs. the underlying valuation can be a good way to check the fund’s homework.

    The Bottom Line

    Private real estate funds are not right for every client or every dollar. They require genuine long-term capital, tolerance for illiquidity, and access to institutional-quality managers. Which is why they remain largely unavailable to retail investors outside of advisor relationships.

    For accredited clients that want portfolio diversification and tax-deferred income streams, we feel private real estate funds earn their place. This is particularly the case for accredited investors that want to build a Personal Endowment style portfolio – the tax efficiency, the income stability, and the diversification against public market volatility all serve the core goal: durable, growing income that doesn’t require selling principal.

    If you’re building towards a life fueled by portfolio income and want to understand how private real estate fits into your specific situation, contact us or book a complimentary consultation.

    Not ready to talk yet? Every letter in this series goes deeper into how the Personal Endowment works – subscribe to get them directly.

    Food for Thought

    • The Historical Benefits of US Private Real Estate via Invesco: A deeper look at how US Private Real Estate as an overall asset class has performed over time vs. stock and bonds
    • Is it Better to Rent or Buy via The Economist: Buying a home doesn’t always come out ahead financially vs. renting long term. It all depends on interest rates, rent levels, etc. At the end of the day, even if the math doesn’t work out, owning the home you raise your family in has emotional benefits that far outweigh what the numbers say either way.

    Thank you for being part of our community – whether you’re a client, a reader, or somewhere in between. If this letter resonated with your own situation, I’d genuinely enjoy hearing about it.

    Nathan
    Founder & Lead Advisor

    Disclosures: This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment, tax, or legal advice. No post is an endorsement of any particular strategy or security. We do not receive any direct payments or commissions for securities discussed in our posts. Private funds are generally available only to ‘Accredited Investors’ as defined by the SEC. The Personal Endowment is a conceptual investment framework customized to each client and does not represent a specific fund or guaranteed outcome. Employees and clients of Kangpan & Co. may hold positions in securities discussed in posts. Speak with a licensed tax, legal, or financial advisor before making any changes to your investments or financial strategies. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk including the loss of capital.

  • Letter# 8: What Everything Costs in Portfolio Terms

    Dear Friends,

    When we were looking for our family home during late 2020, our realtor tried to convince us to look for homes $300k above the price point we were shopping for because mortgage rates were so low. His logic was that the extra $1,000-$1,500 a month weren’t meaningful in the context of a C-level career.

    That would be the case if I were thinking just about the income I was making from my job. But I was already thinking about everything in terms of portfolio income tradeoffs in 2020.

    Sheila had already left her job in advertising to focus on raising our children. So the calculation for how we would make this work if we were going to be fully living off income from a portfolio went like this:

    • $1,000 a month is $12,000 a year in additional yearly mortgage payments (before corresponding property tax, insurance, and maintenance increases)
    • $12,000 a year means another $300,000 I would need to build up in my portfolio if I was going to live off 4% a year in income distributions
    • Saving up an $300,000 could mean an additional year of working

    We decided not to go for the homes that cost an extra $300k.

    Now, we have what we think is a very nice home but Ryan Serhant isn’t about to come knocking on our door to do a video tour. I would call it reasonable luxury, not egregious ostentation. 

    If you’re trying to become financially independent, you don’t have to be Spartan about everything in life but you do need to be intentional with the big decisions. 

    The nondiscretionary expenses are what really matter. Housing, cars, education, etc. These fixed costs are the baseline for what your portfolio income needs to cover.  

    If you’re trying to become financially independent, it’s critical to think about these major expenses in terms of what size portfolio can support the incremental costs and how long it will take you to build that portfolio. 

    Housing is the biggest fixed cost most families carry. But it’s not the only one that can have a significant impact on portfolio income calculations. Let’s talk about education. Specifically K-12 education. 

    Like many of you, education is important to us. We specifically picked a school district that had a very strong K-12 public school system. There were two layers of decisions that went into this.

    • First, we both went to public schools growing up and we wanted our kids to have a similar experience
    • Second, we also knew private school was not something we wanted to have to pay for

    We didn’t have kids in 2020, but knew we wanted to end up with at least two (which is exactly where we’ve landed since). 

    In a good public school system, we could expect to pay somewhere around $5-10k a year in school taxes which would cover K-12 for our children.

    If the school system was lacking and we had to go to private school, that could easily end up being $60k+ for two kids.

    That $50k-55k difference translates to at least an incremental portfolio of $1.25M assuming a 4% rate of income distributions. This could mean another 3-4 years of work to build up. I love my children and would gladly work any job as long as I needed to in order to support them and make sure they got a good education.

    But why do it if I don’t have to? It’s much easier to land in a good public school district in the first place. 

    This is just how we thought about education for our family. Education is a deeply personal thing and there may be other reasons such as religion, specific values, etc. for why you want to send your children to private school. 

    Affording private school is one of the most common issues I discuss with mid-career professionals and an important component of how quickly someone can reach financial independence.

    These kinds of life vs. portfolio tradeoffs and income planning scenarios are a core part of the Personal Endowment strategy I work on with clients. The income-centric portfolio is just the fuel that supports the intentional life that we design together. 

    If you’re in the middle of decisions like these and haven’t mapped what they mean for your transition timeline, that’s exactly the conversation I have with clients. I’m happy to run high level numbers with you.  Feel free to reach out for a complimentary 30-minute consultation if you’re thinking about these things.

    Food for Thought

    • Your Money or Your Life by Vicki Robin: The foundational book on understanding the real cost of major life decisions — not in dollars but in the hours of your life required to earn them. Most contemporary thinking on intentional living and financial independence traces back to this.
    • How Financial Independence Can Quietly Shrink Your World by Jordan Grumet: Jordan is an MD who achieved financial independence and writes about the philosophical dimensions of this lifestyle on his Substack, The Purpose Code. This is a piece about the perils of focusing too much on trying to reduce costs to reach financial independence rather than being intentional about the life your portfolio is meant to fund.

    Thank you for being part of our community – whether you’re a client, a reader, or somewhere in between. If this letter resonated with your own situation, I’d genuinely enjoy hearing about it.

    Nathan
    Founder & Lead Advisor

    Sign up for our letters: Our twice-monthly letters break down strategies we develop for our clients who are generally mid-career professionals with $1M to $20M in assets that have outgrown standard retail advice. See how we’re engineering our HNW clients’ capital to match the lifestyles they want.
    > Sign up here

    Disclosures: This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment, tax, or legal advice. No post is an endorsement of any particular strategy or security. We do not receive any direct payments or commissions for securities discussed in our posts. The Personal Endowment is a conceptual investment framework customized to each client and does not represent a specific fund or guaranteed outcome. Employees and clients of Kangpan & Co. may hold positions in securities discussed in posts. Speak with a licensed tax, legal, or financial advisor before making any changes to your investments or financial strategies. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk including the loss of capital.

Kangpan & Company LLC is a Registered Investment Advisor with the state of Pennsylvania. All content on this site is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future returns and all investing involves risk including the loss of capital. Individualized responses to persons in a particular state will only be made after complying with all regulatory requirements of that state. Kangpan & Company LLC is not responsible for the content of external websites linked from this site. For a full description of our services, fees, and other important information, please read our Form ADV Part 2A, which are available on the SEC’s website here.